EuroEconomica, Vol 33, No 1 (2014)
EuroEconomica
Issue 1(33)/2014 ISSN: 1582-8859
Tools for the selection of microeconomic from socioeconomic rentability
Mohammed EL KHOMSSI1, Ghizlane CHAIBI2
1University Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah, khomsixmath@yahoo.fr
2 University Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah, Ghizlane.CHAIBI@usmba.ac.ma
Abstract. The aim in this research paper is to propose useful and practical criteria to answer the question of targeting aid of a micro-economic structure: Generating Activity of Revenues type. To achieve this goal, an attempt is made to construct macro and micro indices linking the capital of a Generating Activity of Revenues with the update, which allowed us to obtain:
- A socioeconomic partition of structures constituting the fabric of Generating Activity of Revenues.
- Indices based on the global rentability permitting to order these structures of this basis notion.
Keywords: generating activities of revenues, macrostructure index, microstructure index, rentability, current value.
1 Introduction and Objectives
According to the United Nations Programme for Development (UNDP), the proportion of people living below the threshold of extreme poverty in the world has decreased from 43% in 1990 to 22% in 2008. Similar results to those of the World Bank report, which shows that more than 40 developing countries have recorded increases in the value of their Human Development Index (HDI) much higher than those considered; which illustrates the reduction of poverty, and that the world has already reached the main target of eradicating poverty prescribed by Millennium objectives for the development. However, 22.4% of the world's population lives on less than 1.25 dollar per day whereas early 1980s, 52.2% lived under this threshold, i.e. 1.3 billion people always live under the extreme poverty line, nearly quarter of the world's population (Banque, 2000/2001) (Kim, 2 avril 2013) (PNUD, 14 mars 2013).
The reduction of poverty is becoming the priority orientation of public policy. From this perspective, several strategies and programs to combat this phenomenon are implemented to revive economic growth, to improve living conditions, to strengthen human capital, and to ensure sustainable development1 (Lachaud 1, 2000) (Lachaud 2, 2000).
This latter approach has lifted the simple optical balance in the short term which does appease the problems and not solves them radically towards a broader vision of a long-term development. In this framework, and to achieve sustainable social development, the Generating Projects of Revenues represent a means in this way as they have multidimensional implications (Fikri, 22 octobre 2011)(economic, social, health, cultural ...) on the population, weak economically and therefore socially. In Assuming that we have financial resources (either by the state or by non-governmental organization or private sector) a major problem lies on which can by translated in the following questions:
According to what criteria can we help a micro-project to help the poor in a sustainable manner? (Majda Fikri, 2011)
Can we achieve economic and social rentability at the same time?
In this research paper we have constructed several mathematical tools to contribute and answer these two questions.
2 Scheduling criteria
2.1 Targeting help problem
One of the problems is that; for a decision maker to choose2 to finance fully or partially a GAR3 class and justify his choice economically, we consider mathematical tools based on performance, rentability and the impact on the population. An active member of GAR is an effective way to give a meaning to the notion of sustainable development because the main objective is to save the members of the GAR of poverty, helping them develop rentable projects economically and hence choose among the projects those that have the possibility to achieve a gain and get them integrated into a society of production/consumption instead of help/consumption.
The latter situation becomes heavy and unbearable by public and private finances taking into account the current world conjecture (Sen, 1993) (Sen, 2000).
2.2 Criteria of ordonnement for GAR class from the current value
2.2.1 Current value obtained from the balance
The decision to help finance any legal microeconomic structures4 is based on its economic interest, and therefore the calculation of rentability. This latter depends on the project and the involved costs and the gains that provides. If the sum of gains is greater to the various costs, particularly of the investment, it is natural to say that it is rentable.
Our goal in this section is to build a tool to measure the profitability that allows to select from the GAR possible, the one that characterizes this notion better.
Let
C the capital invested by a structure of financial aid GAR, consider
the investment generates cash inflows rated R and outflows recorded
D over the years
with T is the estimated life equip.
(1)
If
we assume that
is the value of the equipment end of
period
T and k the discount rate future value
,
and if we denote
by
flow back to the year i and
to
the output stream, we get:
so we can write (1) as:
This
allows to deduce that the net present value of a investment
is the difference between the net gains updated and recorded net
costs
knowing
, the economic balance gives:
2.2.2 Ordonnement criterion and construction of a canonical partition
Let
set
of GAR possible or alternatives and
the net present value of the GAR j noted
if the decision maker chooses the viable GAR in the set
he is choosing
GAR which achieved:
This
choice is possible because this value is the upper bound of a finite
set
.
In an iterative manner we set
and
}
and choose the GAR
which achieved:
We
will continue the same way until the last of the GAR that:
knowing
that
and
with
and
is reached
.
So
we built the first criterion to order
it allows you to choose the one which carries
and classify GAR's choice (4) this operation allows you to switch of
to
and order the whole structure.
Consequently, we have the following partition:
with
a
sequence of sets decreasing satisfying:
and
with
is
the singleton sets by:
consequently the set of all GAR is written in this form
this
writing is a canonical ordered partition of
.
2.3 Microstructure Criteria
It
is possible to make a choice to support and invest in financing the
all GAR of set
,
for taking this one reference value 1 in the following manner:
Recall
that C the global capital, and
capital
GAR, let
Definition [Profitability index of GAR] is called index profitability micro-structure the ratio of the current value future cash flows and capital:
Obviously
this amount is set to the reference value of 1, indeed,
changes sign and we have three possible cases:
It is an economic loss, but the GAR can achieve social gain
(integration population ...).
There is a loss of present value of the estimated capital or the
costs of not location and the cost of inflation, but this situation
better than the first.
GAR realize an economic gain.
We
summarize the relationship between the sign of
and the notion of economic gain in the following table:
-
Economic Gain
negative
not realizable
null
neutral situation
positive
realizable
For
social gain, all situations are open in three cases. Subsequently,
our goal is to exploit index profitability to build another partition
structure
2.4 Algorithm optimal or admissible choice
A
natural question arises, how to define an order of priority between
GAR finance performing all
?
From
the previous entries, we have a partition
as follows:
which:
The
profitability index is used to construct a partition
and distinguish that which is rentable in economic meaning, that is
to say
.
Hence,
with this choice we have built a second criterion of partition of
,
based on the calculation of the profitability index
.
It
is obvious that if we apply the first criterion and the second, we
obtain a highly interesting classification between GAR achieving a
better discount with index profitability than 1, that is to say, if
we couple the two criteria, we get the
GAR satisfying the two following conditions simultaneously:
The first criterion helps us to choose the GAR verifying the best value discount, the second helps us to choose GAR performing the best index of profitability, this way we get a finer classification. Also we note that:
that:
and
It
means that the selection of GAR by the first criterion is the
structure
.
Therefore, if there is
,
which is an optimal choice, we obtain:
but
obviously, it is possible that
does
not exist in this if we work in the class
and the following choice of decision maker (permissible range), we
search the GAR verifying:
or
We can search the GAR which verifies the best value discount or GAR verifying the best index profitability using a programming language, if we use the Matlab example, the 'sort' to sort the elements of a vector as follows:
Algorithm for selecting the optimal or admissible GAR
>> V = [ ] the capture of current
>> I = [ ] input indices profitability
>> [OV, PV] = sort (V)
>> [OI, PI] = sort (I)
with: - OV: contains the sorted vector V
OI: contains the sorted vector I.
PV: positions contains elements of the vector OV in the vector V.
PI: positions contains elements of the vector OI in the vector I.
if
OV(1) = OI(1) then
=
OV(1) and we have a solution optimal, if not the GAR OV (1) realized
the best value discount and GAR OI(1) realized the best index
profitability.
2.5 Macro-structure Criteria
The
above analysis is a comprehensive analysis of funding, which can or
can't be profitable economically, this stage depends on the writing
index j, our goal now is to construct a macro-structure index that
is to say that which characterizes 5
In fact we can build on the
an index of all structure
from which the following definition:
Definition
[Profitability index of a class GAR] Profitability
index is called macro-structure of a class of GAR
index defined as follows:
Remark:
One
of the advantages of this index is a to compare overall
different
economic structures, in fact, to compare the
profitability
of the structure
with the structure
of
we consider the difference:
the sign of this quantity clarifies that which is profitable overall. otherwise said, this index can allow is to say that in a region GAR type Agronomy better than Craft or vice versa. For example, table 2 is an extract from the Statistical Yearbook of the region of Al Haouz Marrakech (Royaume du Maroc, 2010) gives the social capital of cooperatives of wood and plants as well as the export volumes of 2010 :
Craft |
Capital (DH) |
Export (DH) |
Wood |
2736257 |
27863962 |
Plants |
1084769 |
5709996 |
Table 2
recall
that
therefore
If we assure that the statistics of GAR are identical to those of cooperation in macroeconomic, and if we assure that the gains are reduced only to export, we obtain the following table :
-
Craft
Wood
10.18
Plants
5.26
We note that for the region of Marrakech-Tensift-Al Haouz it is better to encourage and sponsor wood GAR.
Proposition:
For
each structure GAR
,
there are two critical values
and
as:
This result is simple, since it suffices to take:
and
with:
and
2.6
Classification of the elements of the structure
Our
aim in this section is to classify all of generating activities of
revenues constituting the class
based on their net present values to achieve this goal, we introduce
two following definitions:
Definition
[absolute gap]
For every
we define the value
as absolute difference of profitability by:
is positive by construction, this gap provides information on
as follows:
If
tends to 0, we deduce that the net present value of the GAR is almost
constant for all elements of
whereas, if
is very large compared to 0 (
, it reflects that there are some GAR in
more profitable than others, an unidentified interest of this gap.
In
the economic sense, that
tends to 0 or
is very large compared to 0 is a little vague, for greater accuracy,
we introduce the relative gap defined by:
Definition
[Relative gap]
For each
,
we define the value
as relative gap of profitability by:
Obviously,
from the definition of
we have
Classification GAR classes using the relative gap
For
a class GAR
,
if
is nearest to 1, then there is a strong variation between different
GAR, that is to say, there are those which more profitable than
others whereas, if
tends
to 0, we conclude that the net present value is almost constant for
all GAR for structure
If
we have finite classes GAR
, let
, and let relative gap on each
by
we
have
practically,
we can introduce parameter
with
to decompose the range [0, 1] as:
consequently
we group
in
subclasses as follows:
with
Using
this combination, we have classified all GAR of class
using the notion of relative difference in under sets, and we can say
that:
GAR
of
almost
the same net present value.
GAR
of
have a significant variation in the present net value.
For
GAR
the expert can estimate their variations.
Generalization Subdivision:
For more accuracy, the expert may consider further subdivision of [0, 1], it can work with a regular subdivision in this case we have:
as it may take a non-regular subdivision, that is to say:
with
and
for all j=2,.., M-1 and
In this case, we have:
with
GAR
of
almost the same present net value.
GAR
of
have a significant variation in the present net value.
For
all GAR of
with 2< j< M-1the expert can estimate their variations.
3 Construction of a global index
3.1 Concept of a global index
According
to the definition the profitability index
,
projects with
are projects that provide only the same initial value capital, that
is to say, the value of cash flows discounted. Therefore on the
threshold value of 1 is between the projects to finance and those
that are rejected, if we consider only the economic objective,
knowing that
owned
are GAR that can check a social gain, bat not an economic one.
The dispersion around 1 is an important factor to analyze information on the nature of the GAR. If we inspire the statistical techniques (Chabert, 1989) (SILLARD, 2001) a transcript of the idea of the error of the least squares sense, helps us define a global index as follows:
Definition:
Called
global index
of a structure GAR, index defined by:
This amount is used to evaluate the variance of indices of profitability of all GAR projects in relation to the threshold 1, it measures the dispersions and the accumulation around 1. Where the value of this index in the following sense: It is independent of the GAR, more; it measures the difference between the average value, so as to give information on the decision to couple a social gain to an economic one.
From
the equation (5)
also written as form:
recall that
and
and put
Lemma:
Let
indicates an overall structure of GAR
If
and
have the same sign then:
If
and
have different signs then:
Proof:
According
to the signs of
and
we have the following inequalities:
If
then
If
then
If
and
have different signs then:
3.2 Dominant class of GAR
The
objective of this section is to provide a technique to select the
dominant class of GAR, for this, recall that
is written as follows:
which allows to obtain:
The
class
has weight in this writing thus:
put
defined
by the ratio:
we have:
If
is
close to1 we can say that the class
is dominant, in the following sense:
and
Or
is
equivalent to saying that for all
of
,
tends to 1, which gives:
in
a similar way we can analyze the case where
is
nearest to 0. According to the value of the latter, we have:
with
class GAR dominant in the sense described before, and
class GAR characterized that
Consequently, we have a quantized value to know the dominant subclass of class GAR, more, from the two conditions:
and
we get a way to make a strategic decision select the best GAR.
4 Conclusion and perspectives
The research constructed micro-structure and macro criteria based on the index of profitability to give a quantified argument for the decision maker of relie on pragmatic and optimal decisions to help set of generating activities of revenues, according to the strategy he chooses, not subjectively, and not politically .
A numerical simulation is used to select, in all indices proposed an optimal choice or admissible activities generating revenue that the decision maker search to finance. In the prospect of obtaining reliable and practical data from ministries6, we propose, in a future work, a numerical simulation with interpretations.
5 References
Banque, M. (2000/2001). Rapport sur le développement : Combattre la pauvreté. Paris: Éditions Eska, 2001, XIV-38l p.
Chabert, J. L. (1989). Gauss et la méthode des moindres carrés" In: Revue d'histoire des sciences.
Fikri, M. (22 octobre 2011). Thèse du grade Docteur: Planification des ressources.
Kim, J. Y. ( 2013, Avril 2). Discours du président du Groupe de la Banque Mondiale. l'université de Georgetown.
Kim, J. Y. (2 avril 2013). l'université de Georgetown.
Lachaud 1, J.-P. (2000). Les déterminants de la réduction de l'inégalité et de la pauvreté en Mauritanie : une approche micro-économique. Groupe d'Economie du Développement de l'Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV.
Lachaud 2, J.-P. (2000). Echelles d'équivalence et différentiel spatial de pauvreté et d'inégalité au Burkina Faso. Groupe d'Economie du Développement de l'Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV.
Majda Fikri, M. E. (2011). Proposal of a Semi Fuzzy Poverty Index. EuroEconomica, .
PNUD. (14 mars 2013). Rapport sur le développement humain 2013 : L'essor du Sud. New York.
Royaume du Maroc, H. c. (2010). Annaire statistique de la région de Marrakech Tensift Al Haouz.
Sen, A. (1993). Capability and Well-Being . The Quality of Life. pp. 30-53. .
Sen, A. (2000). l'exclusion sociale: Concept, l'application et examen. Banque asiatique de développement.
SILLARD, P. (2001). Estimation par moindres carrés.
1 INDH is a social and economic policy program, as an example applied to Morocco.
2 We consider a decision maker any moral or natural person who has the legal status to finance this type of micro-economic structure.
3 In this research paper we refer to a generating activity of revenues by GAR.
4 There are several legal frameworks and laws to define a social GAR. The model example in Morocco is the social cooperative or association whose objectives is non- profit. ..
5
The
rationale of the test macrostructure because it characterizes
,
without addressing its elements one by one. It is a way to compare
the profitability GAR with another structure (an GAR agricultural
structure and other structure GAR crafts for example).
6 Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Solidarity, Women and Social Development, Social Division Provinces, micro-credit Groups ...
DEVELOPMENT POLICIES
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.