Acta Universitatis Danubius. Œconomica, Vol 10, No 6 (2014)
Generalized Cobb-Douglas
Function for Two Inputs and Linear Elasticity
Catalin Angelo Ioan1, Gina Ioan2
Abstract: The article deals with a production function of two factors with constant scale return where the elasticity of one of the factors is a function of first degree. After the examination of parameters conditions according to the axioms of the production functions, there are computed the main indicators. Also, the combination of factors is determined in order to maximize the total output under a given cost.
Keywords: production function; Cobb-Douglas
JEL Classification: E23
1. General Aspects of the Production Functions
In any economic activity, obtaining a result of it implies, by default, there is a certain number of resources, supposedly indivisible needed for the proper functioning of the production process.
We therefore define on R2 – the production space for two resources: K – capital and L - labor as SP=(K,L)K,L0 where xSP, x=(K,L) is an ordered set of resources.
Because in a production process, depending on the nature of applied technology, but also its specificity, not any amount of resources is possible, we restrict the production area to a subset DpSP called domain of production.
In a context of the existence of the domain of production, we put the question of determining its output depending on the level of inputs of Dp.
It is called production function an application Q:DpR+, (K,L)Q(K,L)R+ (K,L)Dp.
For an efficient and complex mathematical analysis of a production function, we impose a number of axioms both its definition and its scope.
FP1. The domain of production is convex;
FP2. Q(0,0)=0;
FP3. The production function is of class C2 on Dp that is it admits partial derivatives of order 2 and they are continuous;
FP4. The production function is monotonically increasing in each variable;
FP5. The production function is quasiconcave that is: Q(x+(1-)y)min(Q(x),Q(y)) [0,1] x,yRp.
From a geometric point of view, a quasiconcave function having the property of being above the lowest value recorded at the end of a certain segment. The property is equivalent to the convexity of the set Q-1[a,) aR, where Q-1[a,)= {xRpQ(x)a}.
2. The Main Indicators of Production Functions
Consider now a production function: Q:DpR+, (K,L)Q(K,L)R+ (K,L)Dp.
We call marginal
productivity
relative to an input xi:
=
and
represents the trend of variation of production to the variation of
xi.
We call average
productivity
relative to an input xi:
=
the value
of production at a consumption of a unit of factor xi.
We call partial
marginal
substitution rate
of factors i and j the opposite change in the amount of factor j as a
substitute for the amount of change in the factor i in the case of a
constant level of production and we have: RMS(i,j)=
.
We call
elasticity
of output
with respect to an input xi:
=
=
and
represents the relative variation of production to the relative
variation of the factor xi.
Considering now a
production function Q:DpR+
with constant return to scale that is Q(K,L)=
Q(K,L),
let note =
.
It is called the elasticity
of the marginal rate of technical substitution
=
.
3. The Generalized Cobb-Douglas Function for Two Inputs
Consider now a
production function Q:DpR+,
(K,L)Q(K,L)R+
(K,L)Dp
with
constant return to scale, where
=()>0.
Considering the
function q such that: Q(K,L)=L
we have:
=
=
=
=().
From here we
find that:
.
Let F be a
primitive function of
.
From
we obtain:
where C
- constant strictly positive.
In particular,
for ()=
we have:
and the production function becomes (after an obvious renoting of C):
=
or other:
If ()=
then:
4. The Generalized Cobb-Douglas Function for Two Inputs and Linear Elasticity
Consider now the
production function: Q(K,L)=
,
K,L0,
a,b,C0.
Because the function is elementary follows that it is of class C on the definition domain.
We now have:
,
Considering bordered Hessian matrix:
=
and the minors:
=
=
,
=
=
it is known that
if
<0,
>0
the
function is quasiconcave. Conversely, if the function is quasiconcave
then:
0,
0.
In the present case:
=
,
=
It is obvious
that
0.
For
0
it is
necessary and sufficient that:
K,L0.
With the substitution
the statement
is equivalent to
0.
Because the
discriminant
follows that if 0
then .
Therefore:
0,
a0.
We
get:
=
.
But
is
equivalent to a(0,1).
From the above,
for a(0,1),
b0,
the function
is quasiconcave on Dp=
R2.
Also, relative to
the monotonically increasing in each variable, we have:
0
and
because:
=
0
we get
0.
As an example, for C=1, a=0.2 and b=1 the graph is:
Figure 1
5 Main Indicators of the Generalized Cobb-Douglas Function for two Inputs and Linear Elasticity
We can compute, after section 2, the main indicators for the production function defined above. We have therefore:
The marginal productivity:
=
=
,
=
=
The average productivity:
=
,
=
The partial marginal substitution rate:
RMS(K,L)=
,
RMS(L,K)=
The elasticity of output:
=
=
=
,
=
=
=
The elasticity of the marginal rate of technical substitution:
=
=
6. The Problem of Determining the Maximum of Production in terms of Given Total Cost
Let now the following problem:
where CT is the total cost of the production which is suppose to be a given constant.
From the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions we have the necessary and sufficient conditions (taking into account that the restriction is affine):
From section 5 we get that the system becomes:
or:
In order to K,L exists, we must have from the first equation:
Because the
discriminant of the paranthesis is: ’=
0
we get:
Also, from the
existence condition of the production function, that is:
,
the first equation gives that it is always true.
Substituting now from second in the first equation, we get:
and finally we find:
Because
we have that:
=
=
0
As a
conclusion, we have that if
the combination of factors which maximize the production when the
total cost remaining constant is:
7. Conclusions
The Generalized Cobb-Douglas function for two inputs and linear elasticity is determined from the condition that the linear elasticity of production with capital is linear expressed. The problem of determining the factors of production that maximizes output under a given total cost reveals that it has no choice but in terms of price limitations.
8. References
Arrow, K.J. & Enthoven, A.C. (1961). Quasi-Concave Programming. Econometrica, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 779-800.
Chiang, A.C. (1984). Fundamental Methods of Mathematical Economics. McGraw-Hill Inc.
Harrison, M. & Waldron, P. (2011). Mathematics for Economics and Finance. Routledge.
Ioan, C.A. & Ioan, G. (2011). The Extreme of a Function Subject to Restraint Conditions. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Œconomica, Vol 7, issue 3, pp. 203-207.
Ioan, C.A. & Ioan, G. (2011). n-Microeconomics. Galati: Zigotto Publishing.
Pogany, P. (1999). An Overview of Quasiconcavity and its Applications in Economics, Office of Economics, U.S. International Trade Commission.
Simon, C.P. & Blume, L.E. (2010). Mathematics for Economists. W.W.Norton&Company.
Stancu, S. (2006). Microeconomics. Bucharest: Ed. Economica.
1 Associate Professor, PhD, Danubius University of Galati, Faculty of Economic Sciences, Romania, Address: 3 Galati Blvd, Galati, Romania, Tel.: +40372 361 102, Fax: +40372 361 290, Corresponding author: catalin_angelo_ioan@univ-danubius.ro.
2 Assistant Professor, PhD in progress, Danubius University of Galati, Faculty of Economic Sciences, Romania, Address: 3 Galati Blvd, Galati, Romania, Tel.: +40372 361 102, Fax: +40372 361 290, e-mail: gina_ioan@univ-danubius.ro.
AUDŒ, Vol 10, no 6, pp.58-66
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20168/201683da41ebb64478d83776425b18d8915ca4ed" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.