Acta Universitatis Danubius. Œconomica, Vol 12, No 1 (2016)

Relationship between Major Developed Equity Markets and Major Frontier Equity Markets of World



Muhammad Mansoor Baig1, Muhammad Bilal2, Waheed Aslam3



Abstract: The core aim of this study is to compute the long run relationship between frontier equity markets Pakistan (KSE 100 Index), Argentina (MERVAL BUENOS AIRES) stock Exchange, NSE.20 (Kenya), MSM 30 (MSI) Oman and equity markets of developed world (OMXS30) Sweden, SMI (Switzerland), SSE Composite Index (China) and STI index (Singapore) by taking weekly values from stock return prices for the period 1st week of January-2000 to last week of January/2014. Descriptive statistic, Correlation, Augmented dickey fuller (ADF), Phillips Perron test, Johanson and Jelseluis test of co-integration, Granger causality test, Variance Decomposition Test and Impulse Response are used to find the relationship among frontier and developed markets. The results of this study reveal that frontier markets have no long run relationship with equity markets of developed world. Furthermore, this study is helpful for investors to enhance the returns by diversifying the unsystematic risk at given level of profit because results of this study confirm that markets are no co-integrated.

Key words: Diversification; portfolio; frontier markets; unit root test; Co-integration test

JEL Classification: G10; G20



  1. Introduction

There are different types of investment institutions available almost all over the world which offers investment opportunities for investors to make investment in them. Frontier equity markets are also part of investment institution for investors defined as the markets at early stage of growth as compared to other markets, while emerging markets defined as a country having or possessing some of the qualities to reach the level of those developed market which have already occupied their position in the world.

The word frontier equity market was first used by international finance corporation in 1996, represent a small number of liquid securities and offer excellent diversification benefits to investors. The word frontier defined as the small markets which impose restrictions on foreign ownership. The frontier equity markets are launched to achieve economic development and growth by diversifying risk. Before investing in frontier equity markets all shareholders, investors and portfolio managers make assure either their investment funds utilized efficiently or not, also they analyze that any sign of prosperity is visible or not and to how much extent their funds will give benefit to them. Further investors become more aware about safety of their funds saved and they already learn about amount of their risk and return, which may lead them for saving in frontier equity markets. Frontier markets are becoming important source of strong earnings in the form of return, so investors focus on these markets on the basis of following benefits which are offered to their policy owners, there is no ownership in frontier equity markets, creating potential earnings economy for all investors and shareholders in the form of return. No doubt, frontier markets are less liquid but trend of investments does not decrease. (Schroders)

To understand the relationship between frontier equity market and equity market of developed country, selected some major frontier equity market (Pakistan, Argentina, Kenya and Oman) with developed equity stock markets of Sweden, Switzerland China, Singapore for the period 1st week of January-2000 to last week of March/2014. If the markets of regional countries move together to invest in different equity markets would not gain any profit. Regional diversification suggests investing in those stock markets which are less correlated. To gain the benefit of diversifying, it is necessary that your portfolio assets should be invested in those markets which are negatively correlated as compared to developed markets which offer higher return to investors (Markowitz). Now a day's all investors are investing in frontier equity markets and developed equity markets. So individual, foreign and institutional investor began to diversify their risk by investing in different frontier and developed equity markets.

The terrorist’s activities are the major obstacles in the growth of frontier markets so there is huge amount of risk involved in frontier markets, but no doubt the investors are more interested to get higher return as compared to other markets. Effective liberalization encourages the investors to make their investments in domestic and foreign equity markets but unfortunately there is absence of effective liberalization due to market integration, so on these reasons investors get back from investments (Bekaert et all 2003). The deregulation and liberalization affect directly investors behavior and consequently investment trend declines day by day, so investors feel hesitant in making investments mansoor at al (2014).

All business private organizations have a primary objective to maximize the shareholder wealth in a good way. The investor or portfolio managers can enhance the returns by diversifying the unsystematic risk at given level of profit. The stock Investor by making investment in different stock of domestic country are unable to achieve optimum diversification (Mansoor et al.). This may be due to companies’ face the same economic or political situation. So the Frontier equity markets have different economic environment as compared to developed equity market. This study will suggest the investors or portfolio managers to invest across the border in those equity markets which are different to each other economically and politically. In this way, the portfolio managers may be able to attain fully diversified portfolio and minimize the country risk.

The study has objectives to recognize a long run relationship between developed equity markets and frontier equity market and secondly there exists lead lag relationship or not.



  1. Literature Review

Shezad et al (2014), examined the relationship between co-integration of Pakistani stock markets whose selected Asian stock market for the period 2001 to 2013 by taking monthly values of stock market return. This study used descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, unit root test, VAR, Co-integration test and VECM test. Result shows that KSE is not co-integrated with Japan, Malaysia, Taiwan and China. All these tests and their results show that there is correlation between Chines markets and KSE 100. This study also concluded that for the Chinese investors have opportunities to make investment in these markets.

Khan & Aslam (2014), explored the study on co-integration of Karachi Stock Exchange index 100 with major Asian stock exchange markets Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE Index 30), Malaysian Stock Exchange (FTSE) and Japan Stock Exchange for the period 2007 to 2013 by selecting monthly values of stock markets. This study use data description and Augmented Fuller test (ADF) result shows that there is no co-integration of KSE 100 index with developed countries such as China and Japan. But Pakistani KSE 100 index co-integrated with India and Malaysia stock markets.

Prakhar Porwal (2014), explored the concept of diversification that how diversification will be achieved by focusing on frontier markets as well as developed markets. For this purpose, data was collected by MSCI and S&P Sri Lanka of the frontier and emerging markets. The data was analyzed by correlation and volatility of MSCI indices. The result shows that in frontier markets there is more risk involved but higher return will be gained with low volatility as compared to other emerging market.

Narayan et al (2004) examined the dynamic linkage between the stock markets of developing countries such as Bangladesh, India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka by binding the relationship among the stock prices indices within a multivariate co integration framework for the period 1995-2001 by taking daily values of stock markets return. This study use co integration, causality testing, unit root test. Result shows that there exists a long run relationship between the Sri Lanka stock prices with Pakistan. It further used impulse response which concludes that Sri Lanka market has small impact on Pakistani market.

Aslam et al (2012) investigated the relationship between Karachi stock exchange with major developed equity market for the period 1999-212 by taking weekly values of stock prices. The stock data was analyzed by using VAR statistic, unit root test, unrestricted co-integration rank test (trace), unrestricted co-integration rank test (maximum Eigen value) granger causality. The result and finding shows that Karachi stock exchange is less or weakly correlated with developed equity markets and there is no co-integration exists among the stock markets.

Mansoor et al (2012) investigated a study on relationship between major Asian markets (kse 100,india BSE 500,srilanka CSE) with developed equity markets (cac40, ftse100, nikkie 225, s&p 500). The weekly data was collected for the period 2000-2012.the data was analyzed by applying descriptive statistic, augmented dickey fuller test, Phillips test, granger causality test, Johansen co-integration test, vector error correction model and variance decomposition test. The result shows that there is no long run relationship exists between south Asian equity markets while short run significant relationship exists. Further study help the investor or portfolio managers can enhance the returns by diversifying the unsystematic risk at given level of profit. The stock Investor by making investment in different stock of domestic country unable to achieve optimum diversification.

Khalil Jebran (2014) investigated a study on dynamic linkage between selected south Asian equity markets(India, Indonesia, China, Malaysia And Sri Lanka) with Pakistani stock market by using monthly data of stock prices was taken for the period 2003 to 2013. The correlation matrix, unit root test, Johansen and juselius co-integration, Granger Causality test and variance decomposition were applied to analyze data. The result shows that Indonesia stock market shows highest return among the selected Asian equity markets. India and Indonesia equity markets show high level of correlation and Johansen and Juselius result shows that long run relationship exist between selected stock markets. These all results show that there exists no confirmation of selected equity markets with Karachi stock exchange.



  1. Hypothesis

H1: There is long run relationship exists between frontier equity markets and equity markets of Developed world.

H01: There is no long run relationship exists between frontier equity markets and equity markets of Developed world.

H2: There is Lead Lag relationship exists between the frontier equity markets and equity markets of Developed world.

H02: There is no Lead Lag relationship exists between the frontier equity markets and equity markets of Developed world.



  1. Methodology

In this study weekly data of frontier equity markets and developed markets was collected by using Investing.com and Yahoo finance for the period 1st week of January-2000 to last week of January/2014. To explore the relationship, we selected some frontier equity market such as KSE 100 Index (Pakistan), Argentina (MERVAL BUENOS AIRES) stock Exchange, NSE.20 (Kenya), MSM 30 (MSI) Oman and major developed equity stock markets of (OMXS30) Sweden, SMI (Switzerland), SSE Composite Index (China), and STI index (Singapore). This study assists the portfolio manager and decision makers to calculate the return rate by applying the equation of Rtn=logn ( Prt./Prt-1)

Where Rtn =shows the return in a given period t

Prt =shows the price at the time of closing

Prt-1=shows the price at the time of opening

Logn=represent the natural logarithm

In this study the techniques of Correlation, unit root test, co- integration, variance decomposition, granger causality and impulse response are used to measure the nature of relationship.



  1. Results

Table 5.1. Descriptive statistics

 

Argentina

Pakistan

Oman

Kenya

China

Singapore

Sweden

Switzerland

Mean

0.003995

0.004248

-0.00179

-0.00129

8.04E-05

0.000697

0.000327

5.56E-05

Median

0.006076

0.007797

-0.00174

-0.00094

0

0.00209

0.002864

0.002456

Maximum

0.228494

0.109173

0.196173

0.146802

0.139447

0.153205

0.122749

0.162885

Minimum

-0.31181

-0.20098

-0.1139

-0.1481

-0.14898

-0.164684

-0.22528

-0.252017

Std. Dev.

0.048886

0.033678

0.024911

0.026935

0.033586

0.026978

0.031494

0.027724

Skewness

-0.38899

-1.21761

1.464611

-0.39738

0.071572

-0.516395

-0.83174

-1.033043

Kurtosis

7.705482

7.925848

15.51188

8.990935

5.088118

9.334665

7.843319

16.88758

Jarque-Bera

655.8666

870.6017

4761.176

1053.078

126.3109

1187.779

756.1505

5684.02

Probability

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

The table 5.1 shows the description of markets. The table represents the value of mean, median, maximum, minimum Standard deviation, Skewness and kurtosis. The results reveal that Pakistan stock exchange 100 and Argentina show high return while Sweden and Singapore show the positive return. The stock markets of Oman and Kenya represent the negative values of return. On the other hand, in terms of standard deviation Argentina stock markets shows the highest value of standard deviation (0.04) which differentiate it from all other equity markets at given period of time.SO we can conclude that Argentina stock market is one of the riskier or higher return stock market because it gives the highest value of return in a given time period.

Table 5.2. Correlation technique

 

Argentina

Pakistan

Oman

Kenya

China

Singapore

Sweden

Switzerland

Argentina

1








Pakistan

-0.05403

1







OMAN

-0.01873

0.002242

1






Kenya

-0.0368

-0.01364

0.114115

1





China

0.042664

0.003137

0.019924

0.117559

1




Singapore

0.079592

0.042175

0.012116

-0.01806

-0.00205

1



Sweden

-0.02248

0.005737

-0.03101

0.014288

-0.01266

0.622465

1


Switzerland

-0.01282

-0.00328

-0.03398

-0.01858

-0.02412

0.581179

0.760497

1

Table (5.2) explores the correlation among the different stock markets. It indicates that the frontier equity markets are negatively correlated to each other. Argentina frontier stock exchange is negatively correlated with Sweden and Switzerland stock markets. KSE is weekly correlated with china, Singapore and Sweden, while negatively correlated with Kenya and Switzerland. The frontier markets of OMAN and Kenya are also negatively correlated with Switzerland market.

Table 5.3 Unit root test


ADF

LEVEL

ADF

1st DIF

PP

LEVEL

PP

1st DIF

Argentina

-0.63543

-16.9202

-0.64664

-25.608

Kenya

-0.86179

-16.4465

-0.8063

-23.1552

Oman

-0.06037

-17.6506

-0.0431

-25.0565

Pakistan

-1.03391

-16.0384

-0.99302

-22.2643

China

-1.27974

-16.925

-1.24598

-24.7775

Singapore

-1.17255

-17.097

-1.10826

-24.8885

Sweden

-1.14818

-18.1455

-1.20293

-27.7898

Switzerland

-1.57687

-18.5342

-1.75573

-30.9652

Critical values

1%

-3.43959

-3.4396

-3.43957

-3.43959

5%

-2.86551

-2.86551

-2.8655

-2.8655

10%

-2.56894

-2.56894

-2.56894

-2.56894



The table 5.3 shows both augmented and Philips- Perron test confirmed that data is not stationary at level but it is stationary at first difference.

Table 5.4. Multivariate co integration



Eigen value

Trace statistic

Critical value 5%

Remarks

Argentina

None*

0.079856

205.0772

159.5297

Co-integrated

Kenya

At most 1

0.067405

147.5686

125.6154

Co-integrated

KSE

At most 2

0.055726

99.34768

95.75366

Co-integrated

Oman

At most 3

0.035023

59.72683

69.81889

No cointegration

China

At most 4

0.024779

35.09179

47.85613

No cointegration

Singapore

At most 5

0.014847

17.75394

29.79707

No cointegration

Sweden

At most 6

0.010363

7.417996

15.49471

No cointegration

Switzerland

At most 7

0.000318

0.220076

3.841466

No cointegration



Table 5.4 shows the values of multivariate co integration. Result indicates that there exist three co-integration equations at the 0.05 level.

Table 5.5. Bivariate co-integration Argentina


Eigenvalue

Statistic

Critical Value

Prob.**

Remarks

Argentina-Sweden

0.019866

13.86697

15.49471

0.0867

NO-

Cointegration

0.00000226

0.001563

3.841466

0.9664

Argentina-Switzerland

0.012679

8.962591

15.49471

0.3688

NO-Cointegration

0.00021

0.145117

3.841466

0.7032

Argentina-China

0.007237

6.121436

15.49471

0.6812

NO-Cointegration

0.001594

1.102339

3.841466

0.2938

Argentina-Singapore

0.014223

10.20236

15.49471

0.2655

NO-Cointegration

0.00044

0.303822

3.841466

0.5815

The results of above table reveal that Argentina stock exchange are not co-integrated with Sweden, Switzerland, china and Singapore, which encourage all shareholders, portfolio managers and investors to get the benefit of diversification.

Table 5.6. Bivariate co-integration KSE


Eigenvalue

Statistic

Critical Value

Prob.**

Remarks

KSE-SWEDEN

0.018355

13.09568

15.49471

0.1113

NO-COINTEGRATION

0.000426

0.294604

3.841466

0.5873

KSE-Switzerland

0.012848

9.589598

15.49471

0.3136

NO-COINTEGRATION

0.000946

0.653812

3.841466

0.4188

KSE-China

0.005785

5.389523

15.49471

0.7661

NO-COINTEGRATION

0.001995

1.38024

3.841466

0.2401

KSE-Singapore

0.014754

10.92561

15.49471

0.2161

NO-COINTEGRATION

0.000947

0.654901

3.841466

0.4184


The results of above table reveal that Karachi stock exchange are not co-integrated with Sweden, Switzerland, china and Singapore, which encourage all shareholders, portfolio managers and investors to get the benefit of diversification.

Table 5.7. Bivariate co-integration Oman stock exchange


Eigenvalue

Statistic

Critical Value

Prob.**

Explanation

Oman-Sweden

0.005728

4.014098

15.49471

0.9024

NO-cointegration

0.0000647

0.044739

3.841466

0.8325

Oman -Switzerland

0.004745

3.306717

15.49471

0.9512

NO-cointegration

0.0000293

0.020223

3.841466

0.8868

Oman -china

0.020036

16.88333

15.49471

0.0307

NO-cointegration

0.004185

2.897798

3.841466

0.0887

Oman -Singapore

0.005934

4.214785

15.49471

0.8855

NO-cointegration

0.000148

0.102079

3.841466

0.7493





















Above table represents the bivariate co-integration relationship of OMAN (MSM 30) with selected major developed market. The result shows that OMAN (MSM 30) is not co-integrated with Sweden, Switzerland, china and Singapore. So investors have potential to make investment in OMAN (MSM 30) to take the advantage of diversification.

Table 5.8. Bivariate co-integration Kenya stock exchange


Eigenvalue

Statistic

Critical Value

Prob.**

Explanations

Kenya-Sweden

0.005576

4.748923

15.49471

0.8349

NO-cointegration

0.00128

0.884919

3.841466

0.3469

Kenya –Switzerland

0.00874

9.526947

15.49471

0.3189

NO-cointegration

0.004997

3.461238

3.841466

0.0628

Kenya –china

0.009734

9.905461

15.49471

0.2881

NO-cointegration

0.004543

3.146245

3.841466

0.0761

Kenya –Singapore

0.002869

2.645854

15.49471

0.9806

NO-cointegration

0.000956

0.660824

3.841466

0.4163



















Above table represent the bivariate co-integration relationship between Kenya (NSE 20) with selected major developed markets. The result reveals that NSE 20 not co-integrated with Sweden, Switzerland, china and Singapore.



Granger causality:

Null Hypothesis:

F-Statistic

Prob.

 CHINA does not Granger Cause ARGENTINA

 0.78103

0.6196

 ARGENTINA does not Granger Cause CHINA

 2.09873

0.0339

 KENYA does not Granger Cause ARGENTINA

 0.56165

0.8096

 ARGENTINA does not Granger Cause KENYA

 1.43952

0.1765

 KSE_100 does not Granger Cause ARGENTINA

 2.42754

0.0137

 ARGENTINA does not Granger Cause KSE_100

 4.30704

5.E-05

 OMAN does not Granger Cause ARGENTINA

 0.50506

0.8529

 ARGENTINA does not Granger Cause OMAN

 0.91241

0.5055

 SINGAPUR does not Granger Cause ARGENTINA

 21.7933

1.E-29

 ARGENTINA does not Granger Cause SINGAPUR

 1.14324

0.3319

 SWEDEN does not Granger Cause ARGENTINA

 19.2906

3.E-26

 ARGENTINA does not Granger Cause SWEDEN

 1.55105

0.1363

 SWITZERLAND does not Granger Cause ARGENTINA

 15.6387

3.E-21

 ARGENTINA does not Granger Cause SWITZERLAND

 1.77595

0.0787

 KENYA does not Granger Cause CHINA

 0.75250

0.6450

 CHINA does not Granger Cause KENYA

 1.86265

0.0631

 KSE_100 does not Granger Cause CHINA

 2.48316

0.0117

 CHINA does not Granger Cause KSE_100

 2.94565

0.0030

 OMAN does not Granger Cause CHINA

 0.73718

0.6587

 CHINA does not Granger Cause OMAN

 1.36321

0.2094

 SINGAPUR does not Granger Cause CHINA

 2.57337

0.0090

 CHINA does not Granger Cause SINGAPUR

 0.59373

0.7835

 SWEDEN does not Granger Cause CHINA

 1.94984

0.0503

 CHINA does not Granger Cause SWEDEN

 1.49569

0.1551

 SWITZERLAND does not Granger Cause CHINA

 1.51078

0.1498

 CHINA does not Granger Cause SWITZERLAND

 1.81077

0.0720

 KSE_100 does not Granger Cause KENYA

 1.41036

0.1885

 KENYA does not Granger Cause KSE_100

 1.36271

0.2096

 OMAN does not Granger Cause KENYA

 4.43440

3.E-05

 KENYA does not Granger Cause OMAN

 1.73623

0.0869

 SINGAPUR does not Granger Cause KENYA

 1.56386

0.1322

 KENYA does not Granger Cause SINGAPUR

 0.47153

0.8765

 SWEDEN does not Granger Cause KENYA

 0.27483

0.9741

 KENYA does not Granger Cause SWEDEN

 0.58314

0.7922

 SWITZERLAND does not Granger Cause KENYA

 0.64928

0.7363

 KENYA does not Granger Cause SWITZERLAND

 0.96985

0.4584

 OMAN does not Granger Cause KSE_100

 1.29593

0.2424

 KSE_100 does not Granger Cause OMAN

 0.62276

0.7591

 SINGAPUR does not Granger Cause KSE_100

 1.98812

0.0455

 KSE_100 does not Granger Cause SINGAPUR

 2.03545

0.0401

 SWEDEN does not Granger Cause KSE_100

 1.78962

0.0760

 KSE_100 does not Granger Cause SWEDEN

 2.16044

0.0287

 SWITZERLAND does not Granger Cause KSE_100

 2.33972

0.0175

 KSE_100 does not Granger Cause SWITZERLAND

 1.68682

0.0982

 SINGAPUR does not Granger Cause OMAN

 0.81179

0.5923

 OMAN does not Granger Cause SINGAPUR

 0.52281

0.8398

 SWEDEN does not Granger Cause OMAN

 0.53984

0.8268

 OMAN does not Granger Cause SWEDEN

 0.37690

0.9330

 SWITZERLAND does not Granger Cause OMAN

 0.39623

0.9228

 OMAN does not Granger Cause SWITZERLAND

 0.21419

0.9884

 SWEDEN does not Granger Cause SINGAPUR

 3.90892

0.0002

 SINGAPUR does not Granger Cause SWEDEN

 1.77492

0.0789

 SWITZERLAND does not Granger Cause SINGAPUR

 3.66881

0.0003

 SINGAPUR does not Granger Cause SWITZERLAND

 1.38331

0.2003

 SWITZERLAND does not Granger Cause SWEDEN

 2.30097

0.0195

 SWEDEN does not Granger Cause SWITZERLAND

 3.38883

0.0008



The above table shows the result of Granger causality technique, which explore that frontier equity market of Argentina does not granger cause the stock return in other equity markets excepting China, which clearly conclude that just unidirectional causality exists when we move Argentina to China. On the other hand, frontier market of KSE does not granger cause the stock return in Argentina, china, Switzerland and Singapore. SWITZERLAND stock market does not granger cause the stock return in Singapore and Sweden. While SWEDEN does not Granger Cause in Switzerland.

Table 5.9 Variance Decomposition of Argentina:

Period

S.E.

0man

Argentina

Kenya

Kse100

China

Singapore

Sweden

Switzerland

1

0.048499

0.031996

99.968

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

0.049135

0.032069

97.46985

0.014613

0.174115

0.001376

0.640953

1.291866

0.375155

3

0.04917

0.033014

97.33177

0.01965

0.176776

0.011867

0.678929

1.333615

0.41438

4

0.049171

0.033018

97.32713

0.019649

0.176916

0.011876

0.679265

1.334722

0.417426

5

0.049171

0.033019

97.32676

0.019653

0.176918

0.011878

0.679291

1.334771

0.417706

6

0.049171

0.033019

97.32674

0.019653

0.176919

0.011878

0.679294

1.334773

0.417728

7

0.049171

0.03302

97.32673

0.019653

0.176919

0.011878

0.679294

1.334773

0.41773

8

0.049171

0.03302

97.32673

0.019653

0.176919

0.011878

0.679294

1.334773

0.41773

9

0.049171

0.03302

97.32673

0.019653

0.176919

0.011878

0.679294

1.334773

0.41773

10

0.049171

0.03302

97.32673

0.019653

0.176919

0.011878

0.679294

1.334773

0.41773



Above table show change in Argentina stock exchange explained by due to its own innovation and also tells that other frontier & developed stock exchanges have no effect on it if any change or fluctuation occurs in these markets.

Table 5.10. Variance Decomposition of Kenya

Above Table shows change in Kenya stock exchange explained by due to its own innovation and also tells that other developed & developing stock exchanges have no effect on it if any change or fluctuation occurs in these markets.

Table 5.11. Variance decomposition of KSE100

Above Table shows change in KSE stock exchange explained by due to its own innovation and also tells that other developed & developing stock exchanges have no effect on it if any change or fluctuation occurs in these markets.



Table 5.12. Variance decomposition of OMAN (MSM 3O):

Table shows change in OMAN stock exchange explained by due to its own innovation and also tells that other developed & developing stock exchanges have no effect on it if any change or fluctuation occurs in these markets.



I mpulse Response:





























Impulse response function explains the changes in standard deviation. Resutls shows the response of KSE to the changes in the developed equity markets. However, results of Impulse Response Function shows that Argentina returns are not influnced by the shocks in the other marekts.



6. Conclusion

The main objective of every study is to give direction to the readers. This study is conducted between frontier equity markets and developed equity markets. Both the types of stock markets have different economic, social and geographic conditions.so it may be possible that the economic environment for the investors of these countries is different and same is the case political conditions.

The purpose of this study to relationship among frontier equity markets of Pakistan, Argentina, Kenya, Oman, and developed equity markets including Sweden, Switzerland, China, Singapore for the period 1st week of January-2000 to last week of January/2014. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the co movement or integration exists among these stock markets or not because co movement is very important for the investors. The results of this study reveals that frontier market of Argentina is riskier and high return market, showing a behavior of more volatile market as compared to all other selected markets in the study, which is a best opportunity for local and foreign investors to minimize risk. The correlation analysis indicates that selected frontier markets (Pakistan, Oman, Argentina, Kenya) are weakly correlated with developed country stock markets. This study assists the investor or portfolio managers to enhance the returns by diversifying the unsystematic risk at given level of profit. For this purpose, augmented fuller (ADF) and Phillips-Perron techniques are used for stationary of data at similar order by applying on prices of stock return. Multivariate co integration is applied which indication of three equation of integration among stock markets. Later on bivariate co-integration results confirm that all frontier equity markets indicate no long run relationship with any developed markets. The finding of granger cause explore that frontier equity market of Argentina does not granger cause the stock return in other equity market of China, which clearly conclude that just unidirectional causality exists when we move Argentina to China. The results of vector decomposition designate that change in frontier markets (Argentina, Pakistan, Kenya, Oman) explained by due to its own innovation and other developed & developing stock exchanges have no effect on it if any change or fluctuation occurs in these markets.

This study will suggest the investors or portfolio managers to invest across the border in those equity markets which are different to each other economically and politically. In this way the portfolio managers may be able to attain optimum diversified portfolio and also minimize the country risk.

7. References

Khan, S. N., & Aslam, M. S. (2014). Co-integration of Karachi Stock Exchange with Major South Asian Stock Exchanges. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting.

Porwal, P. (2014). Achieving diversification in global. Int. J. Mgmt Res. & Bus. Strat.

Narayan, P., Smyth, R., & Nandha, M. (2004). Interdependence and dynamic linkages between the emerging stock markets of South Asia. Accounting and Finance, 419-439.

BIBLIOGRAPHY \l 1033 Su, Y., & Yip, Y. (2014). Contagion Effect of 2007 Financial Crisis on Emerging and Frontier Stock Markets. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 97-113.

Shezada, A., Jana, F. A., Gulzara, S., & Ansarid, M. A. (2014). A Study on Co-integration of Pakistani Stock Market with Selected Asian Stock Markets. Journal of Management Info, 52-74.

Sarfraz, A., Shehzadi, S., Hussain, H., & Altaf, M. (2012). Co-integration of Karachi Stock Exchange With Major Asian Markets. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Œconomica, Vol 8, no 5, 118-129.

Shahzad, S. H., Ahmed, T., Rehman, M. U., & Zakaria, M. (2014). Relationship between Developed,Emerging and South Asian Equity Markets: Empirical Evidence with a Multivariate Framework Analysis. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 1-27.

Kisaka, S. E., & Mwasaru, A. (2012). The Causal Relationship between Exchange Rates and StockPrices in Kenya. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 121-130.

Mansoor, M., Hassan,, A., & Hussain, R. H. (2014). Long Run Relationship between South Asian Equity Markets and Equity Markets of Developed World. International Journal of Management and Strategy, 1-22.

Tahir, S. H., Sabir, H. M., ALI, Y., Ali, S. J., & Ismail, A. (2013). Interdependence Of South Asian & Developed Stock Markets And Their Impact On Kse (Pakistan). Asian Economic and Financial Review, 16-27.

Yang, J., Kolari2, J. W., & Min, I. (2002). Stock market integration and financial crises: the case of Asia. Applied Financial Economics, 1-30.

Markets. SAGE Open, 1-15.

1 University of Sargodha Sub-campus Mianwali, Pakistan, Address: 42200 Pakistan, Tel.:+92 459 920270, E-mail: Mansoor_uos@yahoo.com.

2 University of Sargodha Sub-campus Mianwali, Pakistan, Address: 42200 Pakistan, Tel.:+92 459 920270, Corresponding author: bilalbcom39@gmail.com.

3 University of Sargodha Sub-campus Mianwali, Pakistan, Address: 42200 Pakistan, Tel.:+92 459 920270, E-mail: waheed_uos0392@yahoo.com.

AUDŒ, Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 182-196

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.